You're reading 1 of 18 findings. Every dollar here came out of your taxes. · Share it — that's how this works.
← All Findings
waste Department of Defence
$22.2M

PricewaterhouseCoopers charged Defence $54 million for HR consulting — $22 million more than agreed, no rebid

Defence handed PricewaterhouseCoopers a HR consulting contract worth $54.2 million — $22 million above the original estimate. Awarded through limited tender. No competitive process. Workforce planning and org design work that Defence's own HR division exists to do, outsourced to a Big Four firm with no rebid.

On Their Watch
RM
Richard Marles
This happened on Marles's watch as Defence Minister, June 2022–present. Contract audit published under Marles' tenure
PD
Peter Dutton
This happened on Dutton's watch as Defence Minister, Mar 2021–May 2022. Contract scope and budget expanded 2021–2022

What This Means

$22.2M of Australian taxpayer money was wasted at Department of Defence. Defence handed PricewaterhouseCoopers a HR consulting contract worth $54.2 million — $22 million above the original estimate. Awarded through limited tender. No competitive process. Workforce planning and org design work that Defence's own HR division exists to do, outsourced to a Big Four firm with no rebid.

Spread across Australia's 10.8 million households, that's roughly $2 per family — enough in total for covering the university fees of 740 students.

  • The Department of Defence engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers for strategic and operational HR consulting services via limited tender.
  • The contract value grew 69% from the original $32 million estimate to $54.2 million.
Amount Spent
$54,200,000
Original Estimate
$32,000,000
Waste / Overrun
$22,200,000
Cost Overrun
69%

Analysis

The Department of Defence engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers for strategic and operational HR consulting services via limited tender. The contract value grew 69% from the original $32 million estimate to $54.2 million. For an organisation with its own HR division and the Australian Public Service Commission available for workforce planning guidance, the engagement of a Big Four firm at this scale raises value-for-money questions — particularly given the limited tender procurement method that precluded competitive price discovery.

Sources

https://www.tenders.gov.au/Cn/Show/CN3945801
Category: waste
Severity: medium
Agency: Department of Defence

What Needs to Change

Action Required

End the pattern of Defence outsourcing HR functions to Big Four firms at 3× the cost of in-house capability.

Fund Action Campaign
PricewaterhouseCoopers charged Defence $54 million for HR...
$4K
of $20K target
18% funded
27 Australians have funded this
$16K still needed

$20,000 funds a Senate Estimates question brief and APSC capability review request on Defence's HR consulting dependence.

Choose an amount
$25 $50 $100 $250 Fund this campaign →
100% of funds go directly to accountability work. Payments processed securely via Stripe.

Impact Scorecard

Updated 30 Apr 2026

Tracking the pressure trail — from publication to policy change. Empty boxes show what's left to do.

📄 Finding published Published 2026-04-30
🔗 Shared 112 times
📰 Media coverage
🏛️ MP contacted / responded 1 MPs contacted
Parliamentary question raised
⚖️ Policy change initiated
💰 Estimated annual savings if fixed $20.0M/year if fixed
Complete In progress Not yet
Share this finding

Every share puts pressure on the people responsible. Make it impossible to ignore.

The Full Reckoning

3 active investigations. 15 completed. 0 in the queue.

Rank Finding Amount Status
1 $7.8 billion of your taxes paid to consultants who left nothing behind $7.8B Active
2 $3.3 billion in dodgy NDIS claims slipped through because nobody was watching $3.3B Active
3 CIMIC Donated $540K to Labor, Liberal and Nationals — Collected $3.1B in Government Construction, 41% Without Open Tender $3.1B Active
4 Thales Australia Donated $195K to Labor and Liberal — Landed $2.2B in Defence Contracts Through Restricted Tender $2.2B Investigated
5 $2.1 billion in government contracts handed out without competition — no bids, no questions $2.1B Investigated
6 Defence blew $1.8 billion over budget on IT projects — and they still don't work properly $1.8B Investigated
7 Ministers overruled their own experts to hand $1.2 billion to whoever they wanted $1.2B Investigated
8 The aged care regulator spent $890 million and can't show it made a single nursing home safer $890.0M Investigated
9 PwC Donated $270K to Labor and Liberal — Then Bagged $700M in Advisory Contracts, Including Confidential Tax Reform Work $697.4M Investigated
10 $719M in community grants flowed to coalition marginal seats at more than double the rate of safe seats $290.0M Investigated
11 Three major charities quietly took 57% of a $402M fund meant for small Indigenous community organisations $80.6M Investigated
12 Services Australia's IT modernisation with Accenture blew $75 million over budget $75.5M Investigated
13 The Australian National University got $175M from a research grants program that chose recipients without competitive bids $29.8M Investigated
14 Home Affairs' IT contractor bill blew up 135% — $18 million became $42 million, no rebid $24.3M Investigated
15 PricewaterhouseCoopers charged Defence $54 million for HR consulting — $22 million more than agreed, no rebid $22.2M Investigated
16 The Bureau of Meteorology's AWS migration cost $22 million more than planned — and nobody shopped around $22.0M Investigated
17 Deloitte built a public service analytics tool for $12.7 million — three times the budget, zero competition $7.9M Investigated
18 Ernst & Young charged double to evaluate an Indigenous health program — hired directly, no competition $4.7M Investigated
$23.6B total waste identified — and counting $23.6B