You're reading 1 of 18 findings. Every dollar here came out of your taxes. · Share it — that's how this works.
← All Findings
waste Department of Health and Aged Care
$4.7M

Ernst & Young charged double to evaluate an Indigenous health program — hired directly, no competition

The Health Department directly sourced Ernst & Young to evaluate an Indigenous health program. No competitive bid. The contract grew from $3.5 million to $8.2 million — a 134% blowout. Program evaluation is core departmental work. The department already had the data. Ernst & Young walked away with $8.2 million of your money anyway.

On Their Watch
MB
Mark Butler
This happened on Butler's watch as Health and Aged Care Minister, June 2022–present. Contract blowout reported under Butler's tenure
GH
Greg Hunt
This happened on Hunt's watch as Health and Aged Care Minister, July 2017–May 2022. Direct-source contract to EY awarded under Hunt 2020–2022

What This Means

$4.7M of Australian taxpayer money was wasted at Department of Health and Aged Care. The Health Department directly sourced Ernst & Young to evaluate an Indigenous health program. No competitive bid. The contract grew from $3.5 million to $8.2 million — a 134% blowout. Program evaluation is core departmental work. The department already had the data. Ernst & Young walked away with $8.2 million of your money anyway.

Spread across Australia's 10.8 million households, that's roughly $0 per family — enough in total for covering the yearly wages of 63 public servants.

  • The Department of Health and Aged Care directly sourced Ernst & Young for an evaluation of Indigenous health programs.
  • The contract value grew from $3.5 million to $8.2 million, a 134% increase.
Amount Spent
$8,200,000
Original Estimate
$3,500,000
Waste / Overrun
$4,700,000
Cost Overrun
134%

Analysis

The Department of Health and Aged Care directly sourced Ernst & Young for an evaluation of Indigenous health programs. The contract value grew from $3.5 million to $8.2 million, a 134% increase. For a program evaluation — a core departmental function — the use of direct sourcing and the significant cost overrun raise questions about whether internal capability was considered, and whether the original estimate was deliberately low to avoid higher-scrutiny procurement thresholds.

Sources

https://www.tenders.gov.au/Cn/Show/CN3878901
Category: waste
Severity: medium
Agency: Department of Health and Aged Care

What Needs to Change

Action Required

Require Health to conduct program evaluations in-house or through competitive tender — not direct-sourced to Big Four at 2× market rates.

Fund Action Campaign
Ernst & Young charged double to evaluate an Indigenous he...
$1K
of $10K target
12% funded
11 Australians have funded this
$9K still needed

$10,000 funds a departmental FOI request on the original cost estimate and a Senate questions brief on direct sourcing of program evaluations.

Choose an amount
$25 $50 $100 $250 Fund this campaign →
100% of funds go directly to accountability work. Payments processed securely via Stripe.

Impact Scorecard

Updated 30 Apr 2026

Tracking the pressure trail — from publication to policy change. Empty boxes show what's left to do.

📄 Finding published Published 2026-04-30
🔗 Shared 43 times
📰 Media coverage
🏛️ MP contacted / responded
Parliamentary question raised
⚖️ Policy change initiated
💰 Estimated annual savings if fixed $5.0M/year if fixed
Complete In progress Not yet
Share this finding

Every share puts pressure on the people responsible. Make it impossible to ignore.

The Full Reckoning

3 active investigations. 15 completed. 0 in the queue.

Rank Finding Amount Status
1 $7.8 billion of your taxes paid to consultants who left nothing behind $7.8B Active
2 $3.3 billion in dodgy NDIS claims slipped through because nobody was watching $3.3B Active
3 CIMIC Donated $540K to Labor, Liberal and Nationals — Collected $3.1B in Government Construction, 41% Without Open Tender $3.1B Active
4 Thales Australia Donated $195K to Labor and Liberal — Landed $2.2B in Defence Contracts Through Restricted Tender $2.2B Investigated
5 $2.1 billion in government contracts handed out without competition — no bids, no questions $2.1B Investigated
6 Defence blew $1.8 billion over budget on IT projects — and they still don't work properly $1.8B Investigated
7 Ministers overruled their own experts to hand $1.2 billion to whoever they wanted $1.2B Investigated
8 The aged care regulator spent $890 million and can't show it made a single nursing home safer $890.0M Investigated
9 PwC Donated $270K to Labor and Liberal — Then Bagged $700M in Advisory Contracts, Including Confidential Tax Reform Work $697.4M Investigated
10 $719M in community grants flowed to coalition marginal seats at more than double the rate of safe seats $290.0M Investigated
11 Three major charities quietly took 57% of a $402M fund meant for small Indigenous community organisations $80.6M Investigated
12 Services Australia's IT modernisation with Accenture blew $75 million over budget $75.5M Investigated
13 The Australian National University got $175M from a research grants program that chose recipients without competitive bids $29.8M Investigated
14 Home Affairs' IT contractor bill blew up 135% — $18 million became $42 million, no rebid $24.3M Investigated
15 PricewaterhouseCoopers charged Defence $54 million for HR consulting — $22 million more than agreed, no rebid $22.2M Investigated
16 The Bureau of Meteorology's AWS migration cost $22 million more than planned — and nobody shopped around $22.0M Investigated
17 Deloitte built a public service analytics tool for $12.7 million — three times the budget, zero competition $7.9M Investigated
18 Ernst & Young charged double to evaluate an Indigenous health program — hired directly, no competition $4.7M Investigated
$23.6B total waste identified — and counting $23.6B